So far, three parts into my multi-part series on the counterintuitive nature of life in Christ, and I’ve yet to receive any comments accusing me of being too negative or of harboring jealousy over the megachurch’s success. Clearly, I’ve either offended (or bored) away everyone who disagrees with me, or I’ve not been clear. Let’s be sure it’s not the latter.
Megachurches are based in extreme pragmatism. Consider the rationale behind them:
- “They allow the church to have resources that smaller churches just can’t have.”
- “We didn’t set out to build an impersonal empire of seeker-friendliness, but its what the people wanted.”
- “Hey, God’s blessing it.” or, “As long as people are coming to faith…”
- “The Bible doesn’t say we shouldn’t have a multi-million dollar building with a coffee shop and a parking structure.”
Video Venues are an exercise in pragmatism. Supporters will be quick to claim:
- “The video sites allow our pastor to increase his influence.”
- “This way, I can spend more time with my family.”
- “People don’t even seem to notice that the preacher isn’t physically there.”
- “Whether we like it or not, people come to hear (our pastor) speak.”
- “Paul wrote letters and sent them around. We use DVDs and streaming live video.”
Professional parachurch missions are a pragmatic response to the Great Commission. Churches outsource missions to them because:
- “Our people are better trained for missions than most people in the local church.”
- “People are dying and going to hell.”
- “A small church with limited resources can’t do as much as we can.”
- “We’ve organized the work into strategic priorities.”
- “We have a great insurance program.”
I am not saying any of these things are necessarily bad. I am saying that they are sensible solutions to perceived problems that may not be God’s best for His church. We should not default to these sorts of pragmatic approaches to ministry, mission, and church just because they “work” or “make sense.” Why not?
How we do ministry has profound and long-lasting detrimental consequences on the churches we serve. If we elevate practicality, effectiveness, and sensibility as church values, we risk changing the very message we preach. So much of who Jesus is and what Jesus does is counterintuitive. Why is it that so much of what the church does just makes sense?
My question is this: how can someone like me (missionary, practitioner) gently and lovingly point out the pervasive pragmatism in the American church without coming across as a negative, overly critical, know-it-all jerk?
NEXT: What’s Wrong With Pragmatism?